Skip to content
Hull Gauge
Recomputed 5 Nov 2026, 03:30 UTC

Hunter 36vsHunter 38

Two Hunter models · used asking prices, listed in Europe and the US

At the same age, the Hunter 38 asks 30% more than the Hunter 36. Neither has a published depreciation curve yet, so we can't say which holds its value better.

same age · 6 shared build years · 10 and 13 boats in them · Indicative · in today’s prices · asking, not sold

02

Year by year

Each build year's Gauge Estimate, for the 6 years both have boats in. Pooled across those years (10 and 13 boats), the Hunter 38 asks 30% more than the Hunter 36.

Hunter 36Year builtHunter 38
—
2009—
£82,500 (9)
£64,000 (8)
2008+30%
£83,000 (12)
£60,500 (11)
2007+36%
£82,000 (13)
£54,000 (11)
2006+51%
£53,000 (9)
2005+41%
£74,500 (12)
£53,000 (8)
2004+34%
£71,000 (11)
Gauge Estimate by year built · comparable boats in brackets, built within three years either side · — below eight comparable boats; a year where neither has eight is left out · the gap is the right-hand model against the left
03

What your budget buys

£25k£75k£125k
Hunter 36
2008
newest build year whose Gauge Estimate is at or under £67,500 (£64,000, 8 comparable boats)
3
of the 3 boats listed now ask £67,500 or less
Hunter 38
none
no build year’s Gauge Estimate is at or under £67,500
0
of the 4 boats listed now ask £67,500 or less

At £67,500, only the Hunter 36 has a build year within reach.

04

A year of ownership

Each at its Gauge Value, on a South Coast marina berth, 44 engine hours a year (the median of 103 UK-listed sailing boats that report hours). An estimate in pounds from published rates, not a quote.

Hunter 36MeasureHunter 38
£5,750
Berth
£5,750
£4,450
Maintenance
£5,650
£500
Lift-out and antifoul
£550
£600
Insurance
£750
£300
Fuel
£450
£11,600 (better)
Total a year, before depreciation
£13,150

Each line is the middle of the cited range, to the nearest fifty pounds. Depreciation is a year of age on each model's published curve, at its Gauge Value, and stays out of the totals.

Neither model has a published depreciation curve, so depreciation is withheld on both sides.

Sources: Lake Yard price list 2026 · BerthFinder · Boatsetter · Velos Insurance; Admiral Yacht Insurance · Boating Magazine, "Calculating Boat Fuel Consumption" · Littlehampton Marina fuel prices

05

Specification

Hunter 36MeasureHunter 38
1980–1984from listings
Years built
2005–2011from listings
10.84 mfrom listings
Length overall
11.63 mfrom listings
Sail
Type
Sail
“from listings” marks figures read from the listings themselves; unmarked figures are from our model register and not yet checked against a builder’s published source.
06

Questions

Which is cheaper, the Hunter 36 or the Hunter 38?

At the same age the Hunter 36 is cheaper: the Hunter 38 asks 30% more than the Hunter 36 across 6 shared build years. Their Gauge Values, the median asking prices of all the boats we observed whatever their age, are £59,000 and £75,500.

Which holds its value better?

We can't say yet: neither has a published depreciation curve, and we fit one from at least 20 boats across six build years and publish it only when the fit holds. We have 19 Hunter 36 boats across 13 build years. We have 13 Hunter 38 boats across 6 build years.

Which spends less time on the market?

Boats of the Hunter 36 had been listed a median of 36 days when we last saw them, against 38 days for the Hunter 38. That is time listed so far, not time to sell, which we don't measure yet. 22% of the Hunter 36 boats we saw 14 or more days apart cut their asking price, against 22% of the Hunter 38 boats.

How do you compare them like for like?

We compare boats of the same build year. For each of the 6 years both models have boats in, we take the ratio of their median asking prices in today's prices, then pool the years, giving more weight to years with more boats on both sides. The figure is Indicative because the thinner side has 10 boats in those years.

Other comparisons

Go deeper