Hunter 31vsWesterly Konsort
Hunter against Westerly · used asking prices, listed in the UK and the US
At the same age, the Westerly Konsort asks 52% more than the Hunter 31; on the headline Gauge Values it asks 15% more, which mixes ages: its boats are older (median build year 1983 against 1985). The Westerly Konsort holds its value better (2.0% a year of age, against 3.9%).
same age · 7 shared build years · 19 and 14 boats in them · Indicative · in today’s prices · asking, not sold
Head to head
The better figure on each line is in orange. Where either side has too few boats, we say so rather than pick a winner.
Year by year
Each build year's Gauge Estimate, for the 7 years both have boats in. Pooled across those years (19 and 14 boats), the Westerly Konsort asks 52% more than the Hunter 31.
What your budget buys
At £14,000 your money buys 5 years newer in the Hunter 31: a 1987 against a 1982.
A year of ownership
Each at its Gauge Value, on a South Coast marina berth, 44 engine hours a year (the median of 103 UK-listed sailing boats that report hours). An estimate in pounds from published rates, not a quote.
Each line is the middle of the cited range, to the nearest fifty pounds. Depreciation is a year of age on each model's published curve, at its Gauge Value, and stays out of the totals.
Fuel is left out of both totals: for the Westerly Konsort, fewer than three of its listings give the engine power.
Sources: Lake Yard price list 2026 · BerthFinder · Boatsetter · Velos Insurance; Admiral Yacht Insurance · Boating Magazine, "Calculating Boat Fuel Consumption" · Littlehampton Marina fuel prices
Specification
Questions
Which is cheaper, the Hunter 31 or the Westerly Konsort?
At the same age the Hunter 31 is cheaper: the Westerly Konsort asks 52% more than the Hunter 31 across 7 shared build years. Their Gauge Values, the median asking prices of all the boats we observed whatever their age, are £13,000 and £15,000.
Which holds its value better?
The Westerly Konsort: it loses about 2.0% of its asking price a year of age, against 3.9% for the Hunter 31. Both rates come from each model's published depreciation curve.
Which spends less time on the market?
Boats of the Hunter 31 had been listed a median of 73 days when we last saw them, against 415 days for the Westerly Konsort. That is time listed so far, not time to sell, which we don't measure yet. 14% of the Hunter 31 boats we saw 14 or more days apart cut their asking price, against 25% of the Westerly Konsort boats.
How do you compare them like for like?
We compare boats of the same build year. For each of the 7 years both models have boats in, we take the ratio of their median asking prices in today's prices, then pool the years, giving more weight to years with more boats on both sides. The figure is Indicative because the thinner side has 14 boats in those years. The Gauge Values compare the whole fleets instead, so they mix boats of different ages.