Hunter Legend 40vsPearson 36-2
Hunter against Pearson · used asking prices, listed in the US
At the same age, the Pearson 36-2 and the Hunter Legend 40 show no settled difference: pooled across the shared build years the Pearson 36-2 asks about the same as the Hunter Legend 40, but each year's Gauge Estimate points the other way. Neither has a published depreciation curve yet, so we can't say which holds its value better.
same age · 6 shared build years · 15 and 14 boats in them · Indicative · in today’s prices · asking, not sold
Head to head
The better figure on each line is in orange. Where either side has too few boats, we say so rather than pick a winner.
Year by year
Each build year's Gauge Estimate, for the 6 years both have boats in. Pooled across those years (15 and 14 boats), the Pearson 36-2 asks about the same as the Hunter Legend 40. Taken together, the estimates below point another way: each draws on boats built up to three years either side, while the same-age figure pairs boats of exactly the same build year, and with this few boats the two can differ. Read the same-age figure as Indicative, not settled.
What your budget buys
At £34,000 you can reach a 1989 of either.
A year of ownership
Each at its Gauge Value, on a South Coast marina berth, 44 engine hours a year (the median of 103 UK-listed sailing boats that report hours). An estimate in pounds from published rates, not a quote.
Each line is the middle of the cited range, to the nearest fifty pounds. Depreciation is a year of age on each model's published curve, at its Gauge Value, and stays out of the totals.
Neither model has a published depreciation curve, so depreciation is withheld on both sides.
Sources: Lake Yard price list 2026 · BerthFinder · Boatsetter · Velos Insurance; Admiral Yacht Insurance · Boating Magazine, "Calculating Boat Fuel Consumption" · Littlehampton Marina fuel prices
Specification
Questions
Which is cheaper, the Hunter Legend 40 or the Pearson 36-2?
There is no settled difference at the same age. Pooled across 6 shared build years the Pearson 36-2 asks about the same as the Hunter Legend 40, but year by year our Gauge Estimates point the other way, so read the same-age figure as Indicative, not settled. Their Gauge Values, the median asking prices of all the boats we observed whatever their age, are £33,500 and £33,500.
Which holds its value better?
We can't say yet: neither has a published depreciation curve, and we fit one from at least 20 boats across six build years and publish it only when the fit holds. We have 15 Hunter Legend 40 boats across 6 build years. We have 14 Pearson 36-2 boats across 6 build years.
Which spends less time on the market?
Boats of the Hunter Legend 40 had been listed a median of 192 days when we last saw them; too few Pearson 36-2 boats were seen on two dates to say. That is time listed so far, not time to sell, which we don't measure yet. 40% of the Hunter Legend 40 boats we saw 14 or more days apart cut their asking price; too few Pearson 36-2 boats were seen that far apart to say.
How do you compare them like for like?
We compare boats of the same build year. For each of the 6 years both models have boats in, we take the ratio of their median asking prices in today's prices, then pool the years, giving more weight to years with more boats on both sides. The figure is Indicative because the thinner side has 14 boats in those years.