Pacific Seacraft 34vsTartan 3500
Pacific Seacraft against Tartan · used asking prices, listed in the US
At the same age, the Tartan 3500 asks 11% less than the Pacific Seacraft 34; on the headline Gauge Values it asks 6.3% more, which mixes ages: its boats are younger (median build year 1997 against 1992). We can't yet say which holds its value better: the Tartan 3500 has no published depreciation curve.
same age · 6 shared build years · 9 and 9 boats in them · Indicative · in today’s prices · asking, not sold
Head to head
The better figure on each line is in orange. Where either side has too few boats, we say so rather than pick a winner.
Year by year
Each build year's Gauge Estimate, for the 6 years both have boats in. Pooled across those years (9 and 9 boats), the Tartan 3500 asks 11% less than the Pacific Seacraft 34.
What your budget buys
At £65,000, only the Pacific Seacraft 34 has a build year within reach.
A year of ownership
Each at its Gauge Value, on a South Coast marina berth, 44 engine hours a year (the median of 103 UK-listed sailing boats that report hours). An estimate in pounds from published rates, not a quote.
Each line is the middle of the cited range, to the nearest fifty pounds. Depreciation is a year of age on each model's published curve, at its Gauge Value, and stays out of the totals.
The Tartan 3500 has no published depreciation curve, so its depreciation is withheld.
Sources: Lake Yard price list 2026 · BerthFinder · Boatsetter · Velos Insurance; Admiral Yacht Insurance · Boating Magazine, "Calculating Boat Fuel Consumption" · Littlehampton Marina fuel prices
Specification
Questions
Which is cheaper, the Pacific Seacraft 34 or the Tartan 3500?
At the same age the Tartan 3500 is cheaper: the Tartan 3500 asks 11% less than the Pacific Seacraft 34 across 6 shared build years. Their Gauge Values, the median asking prices of all the boats we observed whatever their age, are £64,000 and £68,000.
Which holds its value better?
We can't say yet. The Pacific Seacraft 34 loses about 5.6% of its asking price a year of age, but the Tartan 3500 has no published depreciation curve: we fit one from at least 20 boats across six build years and publish it only when the fit holds. We have 12 Tartan 3500 boats across 9 build years.
Which spends less time on the market?
Boats of the Pacific Seacraft 34 had been listed a median of 32 days when we last saw them, against 34 days for the Tartan 3500. That is time listed so far, not time to sell, which we don't measure yet. 0% of the Pacific Seacraft 34 boats we saw 14 or more days apart cut their asking price, against 14% of the Tartan 3500 boats.
How do you compare them like for like?
We compare boats of the same build year. For each of the 6 years both models have boats in, we take the ratio of their median asking prices in today's prices, then pool the years, giving more weight to years with more boats on both sides. The figure is Indicative because the thinner side has 9 boats in those years. The Gauge Values compare the whole fleets instead, so they mix boats of different ages.